frostbite

A warning ahead of time to anyone critiqued; AS a critique, expect straight-forward and blunt commentary. To those reading this: if this somehow offends anyone simply for the opinion of it, this is a CRITIQUE, not an ASS-KISSING.

VISION: The whole "vision" seems relatively bland. Of course, this is a commission, but the overall pose, color, pattern and animal type seems to be used numerous times by other artists if not closely similar.

ORIGINALITY: Again, the pose, color, type of animal/creature is nothing particularly new. The "pixilated" fashion does, however, give some leverage to it, although this trend IS growing larger and therefore, common. The patterns are also technically unique, but it seems to strongly resemble that of other markings.

TECHNIQUE: As similarly noted above, the technique is rather unique. However, the facial and body design leaves more to be desired.

IMPACT: The total impact is weak; There is no particular story nor is there an apparent motive behind this piece (Aside from it being a commission).

Because of the fact that this is a COMMISION, there is not much to be said; The commissioner(s) was/were the individual(s) that desired for this piece to appear this way, therefore, any personal feelings/emotions/stories will have to be addressed otherwise.